About Me

Name: Daniel Miller
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Watch Closely

Watch closely, but no action....  A technique refined during the Clinton Administration.

From Scott Ott:

Bush: CIA Needs More Money to Watch Qaeda Grow

Posted: 12 Jul 2007 07:37 AM CDT

(2007-07-12) — As details of a new top-secret threat assessment begin leaking to the media through the usual intelligence community channels, President George Bush stands poised to ask Congress for more funding to boost the CIA’s ability to watch al-Qaeda grow.

The unreleased National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) will show a resurgent al Qaeda — with training facilities, money and communication abilities not seen since 2001 — enjoying safe haven in the western tribal regions of Pakistan, a U.S. ally.

While the president reportedly continues to respect the territorial integrity of Pakistan’s terrorist havens, and has no plans to violate Pakistan’s sovereignty with massive air strikes on al Qaeda training camps there, he will urge Congress to “help me reduce the surprise factor of the inevitable attacks on our soil by increasing our ability to observe the growth of our sworn enemies.”

Meanwhile, an internal White House memorandum, leaked to The Washington Post, suggests that the Bush administration abandon aggressive statements about the so-called “war on terror” and instead borrow jargon from the National Weather Service, referring to “terror watches” and “terror warnings”.

A “terror watch” would indicate a high probability of attack on U.S. soil, while a “terror warning” means an attack has already happened and more might come.

“Of course,” the White House memo says, “as with the violent weather watches and warnings, citizens will simply have to hunker down and hope they don’t get hurt. After all, like the weather, you can talk about terrorism and you can see it coming from a distance, but ultimately, you can’t really do anything about it.”



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Feel Pretty

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2AE847UXu3Q"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2AE847UXu3Q" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Edwards Video

Per today's Washington Post, Bob Shrum gives a gift that will continue to give until at least the democrat nominee is selected.

In his new memoir, "No Excuses: Concessions of a Serial Campaigner," Shrum recalls asking Edwards at the outset of that campaign, "What is your position, Mr. Edwards, on gay rights?"

"I'm not comfortable around those people," Edwards replied, according to Shrum. He writes that the candidate's wife, Elizabeth, told him: "John, you know that's wrong."

Edwards's pollster, Harrison Hickman, who was in the room during the discussion, says Shrum "is sensationalizing and taking out of context what was an honest discussion about [Edwards's] lack of exposure to these issues and openly gay people. I don't remember anything that expressed any kind of venom or judgment about gay people."

Edwards served 6 years in the Senate, certainly long enough one would think, to become comfortable around those people.  Maybe he is too pretty..

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Imus

Here is my question.  In light of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton’s activities to get Imus fired, where did Imus or for that matter, any other white person come up with the designation of a woman as a ho and feel it to be acceptable to that word to refer to Black women?

I am not defending what he said, someone as savvy as Imus should have foreseen the firestorm, but firing Imus is treating the symptom and not the disease, is it not?  Is it acceptable for some to use that sort of language and not for others? 

If so, someone please enlighten me.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great Television

This video has something for almost everyone.  It is pretty incredible.

If you like or dislike Geraldo, there's something for you.  If you like or dislike O'Reilly, there is something for you.  Turn your volume up, sit back and enjoy.

By the way, who's right, Geraldo or O'Reilly?  Is this simply another drunk driver kills innocents story or is it a the illegal have been deported , for prior arrests, long before this accident story?

I suspect, if Virginia law allows, a civil court will decide.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Common Sense

I read the Cincinnati Enquirer online regularly to keep up with news from back home.  As most of you know, I am a noticer.  I notice many things that strike me as being either nonsensical or funny..  It is both an asset and a curse.

This morning I noticed on the Enquirer's front web page an invitation to vote on whether or not President Bush should veto the recent Congressional attempt to act as military generals and dictate war policy.  (See my post on that matter from yesterday).  Also on the same web page is a link to a story announcing where and when Greater Cincinnati DUI checkpoints will be set up tonight and tomorrow morning.

Am I wrong to think that both announcing to Iraqi insurgents when we'll be withdrawing troops and to drunk drivers where and when the DUI checkpoints are to be located is illogical? 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE

Are we cowards as well? 

I know some of you disagree with me on most of this, but you may not get this perspective from your favorite news sources.

I support President Bush in his decision to confront Islamic radicals.  Of course the war could have been conducted more efficiently and successfully to date but in the course of world history, what successful war effort did not overcome self imposed as well as enemy obstacles?  Recent US House and Senate legislation, based on  perceived mandates suggest that  the US  is striving to  emulate our misguided European friends.  Is history worthless as a teacher?  Should America repeat the same mistakes of the late 1930s as Europe seems determined to? 

What sense does it make for a governing body (the United States Congress) to vote for requested spending legislation (loaded with non-emergency spending) and include language to announce a US Military withdrawal plan less than a month after unanimously approving General Petraeus and his troop surge plan?  Don't they owe to him the confidence their votes demonstrated?  Was 3 weeks all the time he was allowed to implement and finish his plan?

Here  is a link EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE to an editorial written by Mathias DÖpfner, CEO of the German publishing firm Axel Springer, published in Die Welt in the fall of 2004.  I hope you take the 5 minutes it takes to read. 

Events that have occurred in Europe subsequent to that time(Muslim response to Dutch cartoons, riots in Paris, terror bombings in Madrid and London to name just a few) reinforce Mr. DÖpfner's arguments.

Here are links to write your Representative, Senators and The Victory Caucus, should you want to exercise your voice.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Mitchslapped"

Mitch McConnell

I have never been more proud to say I am from Kentucky than yesterday when I heard, on The Hugh Hewitt Show, Senator Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky) comments on the Senate floor  regarding S.J. Res 9, which would have set a timetable for troop withdrawal of troops from Iraq.  He effectively pointed out the gross inconsistencies of Senators Durbin and Clinton positions on this matter.

A link to the Senator McConnell's comments located on the Congressional Transcript is here. McConnell's address starts at the bottom right of page S3184 and concludes on S3185.  It takes a bit of time to load.  It is worth the wait.

Thankfully the legislation was soundly defeated, gaining only 48 of the necessary 60 votes..
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Please sign

The National Republican Senate Committee will respond to this.  The felt the pain in 2006 when contributers withheld because of their support of Lincoln Chaffee and the performance of the Senate Majority (too many issues to document at this time).  Links to the petition are here http://truthlaidbear.com/thenrscpledge/

and here http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/46204f79-2fb6-44af-88b4-9d5abf212bca

at Hugh Hewitt's blog, http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ho Hum

Much ado about nothing:  The Plame leak source was RIchard Armitage, right?

“In Washington this week, the beginning of a trial that reaches the highest levels of power. Former White House aide Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby is being tried on five felony counts stemming from the investigation into who outed an undercover CIA agent. While the case involves weighty issues of national security and could send a man to prison, for many in Washington it has all the makings of a good thriller.” —ABC’s John Berman **

Two words: Sandy Berger.
   Now there is a thriller story being, for the most part, ignored.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Insight

From The Patriot to acknowledge the birthdays of Abraham Lincoln, Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson...

INSIGHT

“Let each man resolve to be victorious, and that the right of self-government, liberty, and peace shall find him a defender.” —Robert E. Lee

“[M]y religious belief teaches me to feel as safe in battle as in bed. God has fixed the time for my death. I do not concern myself about that, but to be always ready, no matter when it may overtake me. That is the way all men should live, and then all would be equally brave.” —Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson

Editor’s Note: Today we take a moment to remember the birth anniversaries of Robert E. Lee (19 January) and Stonewall Jackson (21 January). These soldiers were great men of faith who gave their all (Jackson his life) for the cause of freedom and states’ rights, which we at The Patriot hold so dear. Many may question our decision to honor men of the Confederate States of America, but we encourage those readers to consider our correction of the record. The honor we give these men has its roots in the founding of this great nation.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Phased re-deployment

Mrs. Clinton states,  "I support the beginning of a phased redeployment out of Baghdad and eventually out of Iraq completely."

Brit Hume, on Wednesday after Senator Clinton's statement, defined phased redeployment as "democrat speak for withdrawal". I suppose follow up questions from MSM to Mrs. Clinton might be
  • To where do you suggest we redeploy?
  • Will you and those who support phased redeployment of troops from Iraq accept moral responsibility for the  murders and violence that will follow.  What is occurring in Iraq presently is a stroll in the park compared to what will occur after we are phased redeployed.  Rwanda, Somalia, Bosnia and Cambodia come to mind as examples of what will undoubtedly occur in Iraq, following  democrats suggested phased redeployment only concept.
  • Will she and the other misguided democrats support a rapid return (from wherever in the hell the troops are) back to Iraq when the violence escalates and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are being murdered?
democrats are the majority party now.  They have a responsibility to offer realistic alternatives to President Bush's  policies or they should support him.  Saying she supports phased redeployment is only one  step of a plan.  What is the entire plan?  I thought she was a deep thinker. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Alcee Ya Later

Alcee Ya Later

John Fund of the Wall Street Journal writes:

Nancy Pelosi faces a new challenge. Fresh from the stinging rebuke that 63% of her fellow House Democrats handed her last week by voting against John Murtha, her hand-picked but ethically challenged candidate for Majority Leader, Ms. Pelosi is in danger of cementing a reputation for being willing to excuse almost anything in the name of political loyalty.

At issue is whether Ms. Pelosi, who controls committee assignments, will select Florida Democrat Alcee Hastings to become the new chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, a sensitive body that exercises oversight over all CIA and National Security Council budgets. The current ranking Democrat is Rep. Jane Harman of California, a respected moderate who has clashed with Ms. Pelosi in the past.

Ms. Pelosi is under strong pressure to anoint as the new chairman Mr. Hastings from the Congressional Black Caucus, which makes up almost one-fifth of the House Democratic caucus. But there is a real problem of both perception and policy. In 1988, Ms. Pelosi along with Steny Hoyer, the new House Majority Leader, and John Conyers, the incoming chair of the House Judiciary Committee, voted to impeach Mr. Hastings, then a federal judge in Florida, who had been accused of conspiring to take a $150,000 bribe from a defendant in a case before him.

Mr. Conyers is now solidly behind Mr. Hastings, who has served in the House with him since 1993. He and other members of the Black Caucus point out that while Mr. Hastings was removed from office by the Senate, a Miami jury actually acquitted him of the bribery charge. But others say the evidence against Mr. Hastings was compelling and clear, regardless of what the jury found.

Having campaigned against what she called the GOP's "culture of corruption" for much of the last year, Ms. Pelosi is in an exquisite bind. She either alienates one of the most important parts of her political coalition or she gives the appearance of being indifferent to ethical concerns. My prediction is that she will choose Plan C, skipping over both Ms. Harman and Mr. Hastings and instead appointing Texas Rep. Silvestre Reyes, a former Border Patrol official, as chairman of House Intelligence. Not only does Mr. Reyes have a record of probity and discretion, but he would become the only Latino to chair a House committee in the next Congress.

But should Ms. Pelosi fail to take that escape hatch, many moderate Democrats are openly saying it will be hard evidence that she learned nothing from her humiliation in the Murtha disaster.


William Jefferson is always another democratic alternative...  He and Hastings have much in common.  They are both democrats with bribery issues who are friends of the Black Caucus.

Ms Pelosi needs to obey the 1st rule of holes and stop digging....at least until she's sworn in.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Appoint in Hast(ings), Repent at Leisure?

Carol Platt Liebau discusses Ms. pelosi's adventures.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi's Judgement

Nancy lost her 1st big battle this week when Congressional democrats selected, by a wide majority,  Steny Hoyer to be House Majority Leader over Ms. Pelosi's supported candidate, John Murtha.  To suffer a defeat this big on her first day as Speaker is unfathomable, as the New York Times discusses here.

One of the next items on her agenda is to conduct a vote to select the chairman of the Intelligence Committee.  Most democrats support Jane Harmon, however Ms Pelosi has targeted and supports Alcee Hastings for the post.  The NYT discusses the issues surrounding this debate here.  Apparently Nancy has issues with Ms. Harmon as she does with Mr. Hoyer.  Does she do anything not politically or personally motivated?

No one knows for sure how the House democrats will vote, but from here it looks like Ms Pelosi will be 0 for 2, unless she comes to her senses and supports Ms. Harmon or a compromise candidate..  Even democrats cannot support  Mr. Hastings, who was impeached and removed by the Senate from a federal judgeship in 1989 on a bribery charge, can they.......? 

Hopefully, when Ms. Pelosi tires of her headache, she will stop hitting her head with the gavel...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Pelosi Trap

I've been a bit busy the past week and maybe a bit more depressed over the election results than I originally thought.  Columns like this one by Raymond Kraft are helping me feel better.

Mr. Kraft mentions Duncan Hunter as a long shot candidate for the GOP Presidential nomination and cause heartburn for Mrs. Pelosi and Mrs Clinton.  I agree both statements.  Mr. Hunter would be a long shot for the GOP nomination.  A successful nominee must  win both the nomination and the general election.  Mr. Hunter will be appealing to one issue border control folks, but the goal is to win the presidential election.  The two areas the GOP must add to their base is the percentage of Hispanic and African-American conservative voters as well as appeal to the independant 20% Mr. Kraft identifies.   Democrats will have a record and accomplishments on which to run in 2008.  I like our chances running against that....

Mrs. Pelosi (loses her 1st big battle) and Mrs Clinton (that look) are a blogger's dream.  I am considering an all Pelosi and/or Clinton-all the time blog until my easily triggered gag reflex kicks in....


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »